Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 05 Nov 2024

Biomechanical and Physical Characteristics of Dental Dam Sheets Used for Absolute Isolation

,
,
,
, and
Page Range: 738 – 749
DOI: 10.2341/24-052-L
Save
Download PDF

SUMMARY

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical and physical properties of dental dam sheets used for absolute isolation and to correlate the mechanical parameters with cost.

Methods and Materials:

Twenty-one dental dam sheets were tested: ALLPRIME; Madeitex; Sanctuary non-latex, Sanctuary latex black, green, and blue; Nic Tone blue and black; Mk Life; Elastidam; Bassi; Pribanic; Care; OK; MDC Dental; Keystone; Dura Dam; Flexidam; Sanctuary blue; Nic Tone blue; Ehros; and USE. The thicknesses of the dental dam sheets were measured using a digital micrometer (Mitutoyo). The dental dam sheets (n=15) were prepared by cutting the samples with dimensions of 80 × 10 mm with a 1.7 mm hole made at the center of each specimen, following the ISO 9001 standard. The specimens were tested using a universal testing machine (Emic) at a speed of 500 mm/min until rupture to calculate rupture force (RF, N), elongation (%), and ultimate tensile strength (UTS, MPa), their thickness (mm) was measured using a digital micrometer, and scanning electron microscopy and X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy were performed to analyze the structure and composition. The radiopacity was measured using digital radiography. Thickness, UTS, RF, and elongation data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05).

Results:

The Flexidam dental dam had the largest thickness (0.5 mm), while Nic Tone had a median thickness of 0.3 mm; the RF value (41.3 N) was higher for the thicker dental dams. The other dental dams had RF values ranging from 19 to 30 N. The highest elongation was obtained for the non-latex Sanctuary dental dam (600 mm). The Bassi dental dam had the highest UTS value (15 MPa), and medium and small particles were observed in most of the gums. A loss of continuity was detected in the structure of Sanctuary green and blue media. The predominant elements in the sheets were carbon, magnesium, sulfur, silicon, and calcium.

Conclusions:

The UTS, RF, and elongation varied substantially, indicating insufficient standardization of dental dam sheets. Nonetheless, most of the tested dental dams exhibited mechanical and physical properties suitable for clinical use. The correlation between the cost and mechanical properties of the dental dams was very low.

Copyright: 2024
Figure 1
Figure 1

(A) Cutting machine and dental dam sheet; (B) specimen cut from dental dams; (C) centralized hole with punching clamp; (D) specimens obtained for dental dam sheet; (E) measurement of the dental dam thickness; (F) tested specimen measured using digital caliper.


Figure 2
Figure 2

(A) Specimen positioned on the clamp before testing; (B) Specimen after rupture.


Figure 3
Figure 3

Means and standard deviations of the thickness (mm) of tested dental dams. Different uppercase letters mean significant differences obtained by Tukey's test (p<0.05).


Figure 4
Figure 4

Means and standard deviations of rupture values (N) for the tested dental dams. Different uppercase letters mean significant differences obtained by Tukey's test (p<0.05).


Figure 5
Figure 5

Means and standard deviations of dental dam the elongation (mm) of the tested dental dams. Different uppercase letters mean significant differences obtained by Tukey's test (p<0.05).


Figure 6
Figure 6

Means and standard deviations of ultimate tensile strength values (MPa) of the tested dental dams. Different uppercase letters mean significant difference obtained by Tukey's test (p<0.05).


Figure 7
Figure 7

SEM images of the dental dam surfaces: (A) OK; (B) Care; (C) Pribanic; (D) Elastidam; (E) Bassi; (F) Madeitex; (G) Prehma; (H) USE; (I) ALLPRIME; (J) MK Life; (K) Nictone Thick Blue; (L) Sanctuary Thick Blue; (M) Sanctuary Medium Black; (N) Sanctuary Medium Blue; (O) Sanctuary Medium Green; (P) Ehros; (Q) Sanctuary Nonlatex; (R) Nictone Medium Blue; (S) Nictone Medium Black; (T) Duradam; (U) Flexidam.


Figure 8
Figure 8

Different particle sizes. (A) Small and medium; (B) Larger; (C) Small.


Figure 9
Figure 9

Damages observed on the new dental dams. (A) Care; (B) ALLPRIME; (C) Ehros; (D) Sanctuary Green; (E) Sanctuary Blue; (F) Nictone Thick Blue.


Figure 10
Figure 10

Radiopacity of the dental dams. (A) Image of dental dam specimens next to lead scale on the Xr digital plate; (B) Low or absence of the radiopacity of the dental dams.


Figure 11
Figure 11

Correlation coefficient (r): (A) Between the cost and the UTS (MPa) of the dental dams; (B) Between the cost and the RF (N) of the dental dams.


Contributor Notes

*Corresponding author: Federal University of Uberlândia, School of Dentistry, Avenida Pará, 1720, Bloco 4L, Anexo A, sala 42, Campos Umuarama, Uberlândia - Minas Gerais - Brazil CEP 38400-902; e-mail: carlosjsoares@ufu.br
Accepted: 16 Jul 2024
  • Download PDF